Acted for the successful appellant in this appeal from an interlocutory injunction order in a trademark infringement and passing off action in the Ontario Superior Court. Three Divisional Court judges unanimously agreed that the Superior Court had erred in each element of the three-part test, including in finding that the plaintiff had established a serious issue to be tried. You can read more about the case in this article about it.
About Mahsa Tabrizi
Mahsa provides trademark and litigation support and helps to optimize client experience at Shift Law. She is a Licensed Paralegal, holds a Global Professional LLM from the University of Toronto Faculty of Law and is completing the Law Society of Ontario’s licensing program. Mahsa is fluent in English and Farsi.
Client Work
Insights
Protecting Trade Secrets in Canada: Understanding the Current Legal Framework
The Globe and Mail published an article recently calling for Canada to adopt trade secret legislation to provide clear, consistent, and enforceable protection for trade secrets and confidential information across the country. The article…
When Trademarks Fall to Pieces: EUIPO Invalidates Rubik’s Cube Design Trademark
Following a recent decision by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to invalidate Spin Master’s Rubik’s Cube trademark in the EU, we explore what this means for three-dimensional trademarks in Canada….
Federal Court clarifies the evidentiary burden to satisfy the Bojangles test in trademark oppositions
In 2718971 Ontario Inc. v. Kinde Company Ltd., 2025 FC 1114, the Federal Court considered an appeal from a decision of the Trademarks Opposition Board (the “TMOB”) where the opponent’s primary ground…
Contact us
Let us know what you need help with. We’ll get back to you if we think we could be a good fit.
Submitting information through this portal does not create a lawyer-client relationship.